« Linda Mar Cheers Liquor License Suspended | Main | You Won't Have Sarah to Kick Around Anymore »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c795b53ef011571a82c2d970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ian Butler: Revenue Enhancement :
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Didn't Bill Clinton have some law about not taxing Internet sales? I think George W. Bush expanded the law.
Sales tax in Washoe County was 7.375% and recently raised to 7.75% as of July 1, 2009. I found this out at Sears in Tanforan San Bruno, having a new refrigerator and having it delivered to the Lake In Washoe County.
I had this explained to me. If you buy something over the Internet and if it is shipped or the company ships in the state you reside, the rules are different. Dell Computer used to charge sales tax and send the money in to the proper agency.
Posted by: jim alex | July 03, 2009 at 05:50 AM
"Since internet sales aren’t taxed, those sales would have been unaffected by Measure D,..."
Actually this isn't true, if the sales are within California. Assuming the "personal wares" are sold from Pacifica, any California purchaser would be charged sales tax.
And within interstate commerce is the unenforced law that local use tax, i.e., what is owed to the receiving jurisdiction, should be collected.
There isn't any uniform law within the states that would regulate and collect tax revenue.
That needs to be corrected, as much revenue would result and business playing fields would, in part, be leveled.
Posted by: Lionel Emde | July 02, 2009 at 09:55 PM