Alandrome: Sterling Example of Racism
Petition: Alternatives to Widening Highway 1

Pacifica Needs Growth Management

By Hal Bohner, Special to Riptide

The proposed new General Plan is badly flawed. It actually encourages more housing. That’s unbelievable! We need to put the brakes on new housing, not encourage more.

The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the new General Plan clearly shows that if more housing is built, traffic will just get much worse. Here are a few examples, with LOS indicating Level of Service. LOS E means bad and LOS F means really bad.

(1) The intersection of Highway 35 and Hickey Boulevard is now at LOS E, with a delay of 65 seconds.  By 2035, with proposed new construction, it will be at LOS F, with traffic delay twice what it is now.

(2) The intersection of Reina del Mar and Highway 1 is now at LOS F, with a delay of 175 seconds. By 2035, it still will be at LOS F, with slightly less (140 seconds) delay even if the Calera Parkway Project is built.

(3) The intersection of Fassler and Highway 1 is now at LOS F, with a delay of 93 seconds. By 2035, it still will be at LOS F, with slightly less delay (73 seconds) even if the Calera Parkway Project is built.

(4) The intersection of Linda Mar Boulevard and Highway 1 is now at LOS E, with a delay of 65 seconds. By 2035, it will be at LOS F, with a delay of 83 seconds. The Calera Parkway Project would not improve traffic at that intersection whatsoever.

You don’t need to take my word for it. Read it in Table 3.2-5 of the General Plan DEIR at page 3.2-24. This situation could be improved by growth management. Many cities include growth management in their general plans. Pacifica should do it, too. We just need the political will. For more on this, please read my blog:


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Overpopulation Pollyannas have no answers to real-world excesses and simply trot out many-times-failed fallacies supported by nothing other than a near-religious belief in the growth ethic. Pacifica doesn't have a shortage of anything that could be provided by additional development. It has a "longage" of people trying to live urban lives here. Until cornucopians can come up with that fabled Horn of Plenty, the discernible, material facts of life must prevail in any planning that seeks to serve people over the long term.

So the US population has grown by 25 million a decade, but Pacifica should stay as it was in 1980? If every city behaved like Pacifica, imagine the consequences. Shortage of housing? That's a great recipe for stagnation, higher rents, struggling business, fewer jobs, and lower revenues. There are many benefits to increased housing as I just mentioned. Property tax is just one. Nobody is talking about making us into Daly City. Just adding 3 percent to 5 percent a year for a few years is not going to ruin Pacifica.

1 Corinthians 13:11 -- When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child; but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

Growth beyond what is sustainable is a childish thing. Blind adherence to the growth ethic shows a lack of understanding and childish thinking. ("Sustainable" used without a qualifying time period is that which can be continued indefinitely.) To put away childish things is to become mature.

The City of Pacifica, like most governments in the U.S. at all levels, needs to grow up for the future sake of its residents, businesses, and others who spend time within its borders. Rather than devoting its limited natural resources and sources of income to getting bigger through such developments as additional housing and draws for hordes of visitors -- which means resources per person will become smaller and fewer and more expensive as carrying capacity is actually reduced by artificial development and more people must drink out of the same metaphorical bucket -- the city should shift the focus of its planning to becoming better, to planning toward the ideal of sustainability. Among other aspects of acting like a grown-up, this means living within its means, whatever those means are. The longer this transition is delayed, the more difficult it will be for myriad reasons and the more life will be degraded for all but those wealthy enough to isolate themselves from the negative consequences of the related matters of overpopulation, uncertain and diminished resources, escalating costs, and a degraded environment.

Problems like overloaded infrastructure and government unable to pay for itself, as important as it is to point out their realities to wake folks up to facts and processes already under way, are not canaries in the coal mine here and elsewhere in the Bay Area. Those canaries died decades ago. Excesses of the past century are obvious. What is needed is dedication to putting away childish things and using wisdom to reverse the thinking and mistakes of the past, and proceed with the help of the positive attributes that remain.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)