By C. Shells
A development of 34 residential units has been proposed on Fassler just "below" the SeaCrest condominiums. To do this, the developer wishes to change the Open Space Residential Designation to Low Density, which will allow him to build more than one unit on the "flat" part of Fassler (where the "cattle chute" has been erected). This will also mean that we will lose one lane of traffic on the uphill part of Fassler. The developer maintains that the addition of 34 units will have no impact on traffic on Fassler.
Originally, the plan called for a community center and amphitheater with only three parking spaces, but the developer has now replaced that with a reflecting pool. All of this is just in the concept stage right now. If the designation change is approved, the developer can come back with a totally different and larger project. He is not required to build what he is proposing now. And if the designation change is approved, he can simply sell the land and someone else could come in and build a larger project.
If you have reservations about this project, please email the Planning Commissioners and the Planning Department. So far, the developer has packed the meetings with people who support him. Many of you cannot attend evening meetings, but a mass of emails will also have an impact on the decision the Planning Commission makes. The issues to emphasize: traffic, change of Open Space Residential Designation, density of the project, the visual impact of the project (almost all of it will be visible from both Fassler and Highway 1), anything to be built should be built on the easterly portion of the property, which is already designated Low Density.
Planning Commissioners:
William (Leo) Leon
Chris Ranken
Harold Cicerone
Ron Maykel
BJ Nathanson
Richard Campbell
Tom Clifford
Planning Department:
Michael Crabtree, Planning Director
Kathryn Farbstein, Planner for this development
(C. Shells is a contributing writer for the Pacifica Riptide grassroots collective.)
"Prospects" consists of 34 units: 17 condos and 17 townhouses. Besides adding even more traffic to an already congested road in the morning and evening, there are other problems associated with this. Even at that, staff recommendation is for approval.
All parking for the complex is in an underground garage, which requires lots of excavation. The land where the project is to be built is currently zoned open space residential with one house per five acres. The owner has two adjacent but not legally linked lots and according to draft EIR will not be legally linked. The upper lot, which is harder to build upon, is zoned for 33 units. so the idea is to take the housing unit total, flip the zoning, and build on the spot that was designated in the 1980s general plan to be open space residential.
If you are driving up Fassler, the project's driveway would be where the unofficial driveway is now blocked off on the north side of the street. There is a big promo on community gardens, trails, picnic area, amphitheatre, meeting space, but there are only two regular and one handicapped parking spot for nonresidents. Asked about this and the response was that this is all for the residents despite this being pushed as one of the benefits for Pacifica. (If they won't be honest about this, what can you count on?)
Building on this property requires the City Council to do a general plan amendment. Of course, if the zoning can be changed here to suit the developer's desires, I am sure you can imagine what else can be changed. Pacifica has been doing planning by piecemeal changes to its general plan—clogging the roads, ignoring the need for additional job-creating business, and creating the ultimate residential tax burden for a city with a surplus of housing compared to available jobs.