« Melting Permafrost Releases Methane Gas Bubbles | Main | Minnesota Newspapers Get State Money to Retrain Staff for Internet Work »

February 24, 2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is_20070705/ai_n19360733

Interesting article:

"The city has partnered with Pacifica's Livability Project and Whole Energy, a biodiesel production company from Washington, to build a biodiesel plant that will bring recycled veggie fuel to locals and help with the city's energy production and clean sewage water."
Although this will not be the first biodiesel plant in the country, the partnership between the city, a nonprofit group, and a private company, is unique.

"Alternative energy is where our future is going to be and Pacifica is at the forefront, showing that it can be done on a local level," says Vreeland. "It's community-driven, it's city-supported and there is a private sector -- that's a real recipe for a successful project."

The biodiesel production plant was spearheaded by environmental activist Nancy Hall as well as other members of Pacifica's Livability Project, who ran a biodiesel co-op out of a garage. When Hall got her first biodiesel car -- a 1979 Mercedes designed to run on diesel -- she realized that there was a problem with the supply.

"We were getting our diesel from a guy in Richmond," she remembers. "He was the only person I saw who was making pretty decent quantity and pretty decent quality. I realized that was a huge stumbling block with it.

"We couldn't get people to climb on board because it was expensive, it was hard to find and it wasn't always good quality. That troubled me. I thought there is this great alternative, but it's not as available as it should be; it shouldn't be completely rocket science to figure out how to make it on a bigger scale."

"This project was designed and put forward four years ago by me as a then-participant in The Livability Project, a nonprofit organization that sought to create projects that addressed alternative energy issues; the City of Pacifica, in particular its public works department; and eventually Whole Energy Fuels, which answered the City's request for qualifications.

The on-paper partnership took the form of a ground lease because the city's legal counsel seemed to
think it was the only way to keep the two entities autonomous even though they are working on a project together. You can ask her about that if you want to.

There is no formal partnership with the nonprofit entity in regards to this project. I was working on it mostly as an individual but under its umbrella, and of course with its blessing and support. It has since gone on to other projects."

Posted by: nancy hall | February 25, 2009 at 07:22 PM

This explains it...??? on-paper partnership? then-participant?

Can anyone explain what was said in that post or is it just something those under the table can understand?

Nancy, whatever the outcome of the biodiesel facility, you have achieved a great deal personally through this project. You put together an idea for something that is being copied by others like the city of San Francisco, a business plan that is being copied as well, and an application to the CCC for a CDP that was conditionally approved. That's three huge achievements you should be very proud of.

Whatever the outcome, you have achieved these things.

When we talked about this weeks before the council vote, and if you remember, I clearly explained where I thought the weak link lay. I talked about administrative shortcuts and lack of follow-through by others that you had/have no control over. You did your job extremely well.

This project was designed and put forward four years ago by me as a then-participant in The Livability Project, a nonprofit organization that sought to create projects that addressed alternative energy issues; the City of Pacifica, in particular its public works department; and eventually Whole Energy Fuels, which answered the City's request for qualifications.

The on-paper partnership took the form of a ground lease because the city's legal counsel seemed to
think it was the only way to keep the two entities autonomous even though they are working on a project together. You can ask her about that if you want to.

There is no formal partnership with the nonprofit entity in regards to this project. I was working on it mostly as an individual but under its umbrella, and of course with its blessing and support. It has since gone on to other projects.

Lance wants to know when this party is and who's invited? Seems it should be open to the interested minions.

Of interest is the USFWS statement in the letter that the biological part of the Waste Water Treatment Plant EIR is invalid because the city didn't follow the agreed-to recommendations in the EIR, which also invalidates its use by the city to certify the WEF project. But the Fish and Wildlife Service doesn't fully understand who the project sponsor is, what involvement there is by the city, and where exactly WEF fits into all this.

Mr. Gromm's response letter tries to clarify the city's position but contradicts several public statements by elected officials. Though officials such as Councilman Vreeland have identified the WEF project as a partnership between public, private, and nonprofit groups, Mr. Gromm's letter clearly states that there is no relationship between the city and WEF beyond lessor and leasee.

It should be an interesting meeting. I know I'd like to be there.


I'm sure one or two little snakes and froggies will not mind giving their lives for the greater good.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Red Rocks, Colorado and Utah

  • IMG_0955
    By John Maybury riding Amtrak

Southeast France

  • 30-Sainte Agnes
    Photos by John Elk

Viva Mexico

  • Mexico 01 Mexico City Cathedral
    Photos by John Elk

Snow Train

  • IMG_0830
    Photos by John Maybury, onboard Amtrak's California Zephyr

Uzbekistan

  • 7-Samakand
    Photos by John Elk

Dordogne

  • 12-Chateau de Commarque sunset
    Photos by John Elk

Brittany

  • 5-Cado
    Photos by John Elk

Canyons, Cliffs & Clouds

  • IMG_0714
    Photos by John Maybury

Italy

  • 44-Ravello
    Photos by John Elk

Australian Rainforest

  • 2016_0529reunionfamily0032_opt
    Photos by Joel Maybury

Pacifica Shorebirds

  • 20110819_7165.2
    Photos by Paul Donahue

Colombia

  • 20-San Agustin painted statue
    Photos by John Elk

Botswana

  • 27-Okavango elephant
    Photos by John Elk

Namibia

  • 16-Etosha rhinoceros
    Photos by John Elk

Scary Pumpkins

  • Unknown-16
    Photos by Ray Villafane

Big Sur

  • P1030837
    Photos by Dave Yuhas

Joshua Tree Natl. Park

  • Img_0815
    Photos by John Maybury

Gray Lodge

  • IMG_0985
    Photos by John Maybury

Yachats, Oregon

  • IMG_1044
    Photos by John Maybury

Bagpipes on the Beach

  • Img_0258
    Photos by John Maybury

Tucson Botanical Gardens

  • Img_0794
    Photos by John Maybury

Pima Air/Space Museum

  • Img_0758
    Photos by John Maybury

Desert Springtime

  • Img_0839
    Photos by John Maybury