[Forwarded by Butch Larroche]
Post a comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Auto Erotic: Pebble Beach Concours d'Elegance | Main | Pot Farmers Cause Santa Barbara Wildfire »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Steve,
Will you please quit citing tiresome facts, PLEASE! My fantasy is my reality.
Posted by: Lionel Emde | August 19, 2009 at 08:08 AM
Summer, er, Kathy says, "The common good in this case is surely the SF taxpayer, who subsidizes this course for $millions annually."
It's tiresome to have to keep repeating this, but according to the SF Budget Analyst report issued in April of this year, Sharp Park Golf Course cost SF taxpayers $42,784. Not millions. It also said if the revenues from the golf course go away, there will be no source of revenue to offset the remaining costs of maintaining the land.
http://www.thesweetmelissa.com/files/sharp-park-budget-report.pdf
Posted by: Steve Sinai | August 19, 2009 at 12:03 AM
Kathy, are you an S F taxpayer? Yes or no.
"SF residents or not -- are a tiny fraction of those who pay for the course."
Again, using your same logic, G G Park should be closed because a tiny fraction of the S F population who pay for it use it regularly.
While we're at it, let's close Yosemite and every other National Park because a tiny fraction of U S residents who pay for them really use these parks as well.
Do you see how silly your argument is? Is it money or snakes and frogs you are worried about? Make up your mind.
Posted by: Butch Larroche | August 18, 2009 at 10:04 PM
The common good in this case is surely the SF taxpayer, who subsidizes this course for $millions annually. Those who play the course-- SF residents or not -- are a tiny fraction of those who pay for the course.
There's a video at www.restoresharppark.org that summarizes use studies, liabilities, etc.
Posted by: Kathy Jana | August 18, 2009 at 09:03 PM
I won't bet against Todd on this one. In the KGO report, even Mirkarimi didn't seem all that intent on closing the golf course.
Posted by: Steve Sinai | August 18, 2009 at 03:12 PM
Much ado about nothing. I'm taking bets for SPGC staying a golf course.
Posted by: todd bray | August 18, 2009 at 01:28 PM
Todd,
You nailed it.
Very sweet people trying to enjoy life with minimal imposition on the environment, getting beat up by hard-line eco-fascists. Empathy and activism for our planet is fine, but land grabbing politics is hurting everyone.
Posted by: mike bell | August 18, 2009 at 09:38 AM
sweet people, common good.
Posted by: todd bray | August 17, 2009 at 10:40 PM