« Petition: Save Our Pacifica Resource Center | Main | Opinion: Is It Time for the City of Pacifica to Start Thinking About the Unthinkable—Bankruptcy? »

March 19, 2012

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

You people do understand, our City Hall could have called Caltrans and asked them to reset the lights in Pacifica. In fact, I called Caltrans as a private citizen and they told me it is a simple request by City Hall. I brought the information to City Hall and they sat on it, circular filed it, or shredded the information. That would have been a very simple request. Asking the local schools to stagger drop-off times and asking the schools to try to car-pool kids in the morning. I understand parents drop off the kids on the way out of town, but many just turn around and come back home. Maybe the open enrollment has to be studied. Send kids to school in their own neighborhoods instead of having people driving kids all over town. A drop-off point in Vallemar would help. Keep in mind this intersection hasn't been changed or been perfected in over 30 years. 30 years ago Vallemar had considerably fewer homes than now.

Remember, the city had the chance to be the lead agency and put money into this project, but they did nothing. This Highway 1 debate has been going on since the mid-1970s.

It is sad that a core few in town would rather see the town fail, file bankruptcy, be dirty and not take its true potential as a beach town, and capitalize on it. Every other beach town on the West Coast makes money off being a beach town, except for Pacifica.

The core group continues to put their self centered needs and wants ahead of everyone else in town. Only the core 50 or so people can not see the writing on the wall.

Only a few parcels in town are left to bring in revenue-producing projects and the same old song and dance goes on.

You claim there was a traffic problem for Peebles to build in the quarry, but now you say there isn't enough traffic to justify fixing Highway 1.

What about the Manor overpass? Last I heard that was crumbling apart. Asking Caltrans to help fix this? I have heard nothing.

When I mention the area around San Bruno, the 1000 housing units built across from Tanforan, I don't hear a word. I offered to bring a couple of the core group over to San Bruno for a field trip and I hear nothing but crickets. I would even sit down with you two and buy you lunch. Traffic flows better through this area and when you consider Bayhill Office Park and Tanforan and the new housing across the street.

Caltrans will do what Caltrans will do. You can start a blog, whine, complain, start a bitch and moan site. Caltrans and the prison union are the most powerful in the state.

Try to sue to slow them down and this core group will be crushed.

Just my .02 cents

Now I am back to work.

please continue.....

Mary gets funny post of the year!

It really pisses me off (please pardon my French and my apologies to the kiddies out there) when the city requests an XGHFRD supplemented by a VYTHJ and augmented with an HFUYF from the DSJTF division of the DMNJUYY. But to make matters worse, they add insult to injury by filing for a BFVJOI. Now that just ain't right! Period. And imagine following that whole mess up by petitioning the GMZXZ for a PKWQA without even a public hearing? Well, now that stinks to high heaven! If only they had appealed to the DOA for an EIEIO PDQ we wouldn't be in this mess in the first place. I know hindsight is 20-20, but why does it seem everyone other than me is wearing bifocals on this?

"...but according to the San Mateo County Transportation Authority, the City Council must adopt the FEIR and then make a formal funding request to the TA for the TA to allocate $4 million for the design phase."

How can the city adopt an FEIR to fund the design of a project that will require a Coastal Development Permit from the city? There are far too many carts in front of far too many horses for me to understand this.

This is going to gut Pacifica's quaint, scenic Rockaway district, add highway sound walls, and pave over a lot of Pacifica -- changing the scenic and rural character forever -- without any professional look at the many, many alternatives that have been suggested by the public and ignored by the San Mateo County Transportation Authority.

The City of Pacifica elected officials owe the public they serve to have public forums on this "A Freeway Runs Through It" project proposed for Pacifica.

The City Council decided not to have a public hearing on the draft EIR. Several people appeared at a council meeting to ask the council to do that, but it was not required to do it, and so it didn't. Caltrans will certify its own final EIR. It's not clear yet if the City Council has to hold a public hearing on the FEIR, but according to the San Mateo County Transportation Authority, the City Council must adopt the FEIR and then make a formal funding request to the TA for the TA to allocate $4 million for the design phase.

Pacifica City Council must hold a public forum on the Draft Environmental Impact Report. This is not a "backroom deal." This is public money being spent on a public project.

The local paper wrote up the local meeting here:
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=1752044&title=Pacifica%20officials%20split%20over%20Highway%201%20plans

Once again, the voluminous public input was not taken into consideration -- or even read -- before this vote. There was less than a week's notice for this public meeting about the highway widening.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 03/2007

Red Rocks, Colorado and Utah

  • IMG_0955
    By John Maybury riding Amtrak

Southeast France

  • 30-Sainte Agnes
    Photos by John Elk

Viva Mexico

  • Mexico 01 Mexico City Cathedral
    Photos by John Elk

Snow Train

  • IMG_0830
    Photos by John Maybury, onboard Amtrak's California Zephyr

Uzbekistan

  • 7-Samakand
    Photos by John Elk

Dordogne

  • 12-Chateau de Commarque sunset
    Photos by John Elk

Brittany

  • 5-Cado
    Photos by John Elk

Canyons, Cliffs & Clouds

  • IMG_0714
    Photos by John Maybury

Italy

  • 44-Ravello
    Photos by John Elk

Australian Rainforest

  • 2016_0529reunionfamily0032_opt
    Photos by Joel Maybury

Pacifica Shorebirds

  • 20110819_7165.2
    Photos by Paul Donahue

Colombia

  • 20-San Agustin painted statue
    Photos by John Elk

Botswana

  • 27-Okavango elephant
    Photos by John Elk

Namibia

  • 16-Etosha rhinoceros
    Photos by John Elk

Scary Pumpkins

  • Unknown-16
    Photos by Ray Villafane

Big Sur

  • P1030837
    Photos by Dave Yuhas

Joshua Tree Natl. Park

  • Img_0815
    Photos by John Maybury

Gray Lodge

  • IMG_0985
    Photos by John Maybury

Yachats, Oregon

  • IMG_1044
    Photos by John Maybury

Bagpipes on the Beach

  • Img_0258
    Photos by John Maybury

Tucson Botanical Gardens

  • Img_0794
    Photos by John Maybury

Pima Air/Space Museum

  • Img_0758
    Photos by John Maybury

Desert Springtime

  • Img_0839
    Photos by John Maybury