« Manor's Rainbow Island Restaurant for Sale | Main | When the Local Newspaper Gives Up Local Control »

September 18, 2013

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Do you have a report from this "professional traffic engineer," Mr. Leon? A name even? Proof, as they say here. Otherwise, it's really meaningless. It sounds like he/she suggested alternatives that have already been proven by real experts not to be viable, e.g., traffic light timing and school schedules. But thank you for your efforts.

Chris, you should be a traffic engineer. You could surely offer as supine an opinion to the city as its servants do.

"Oh yes, everything is FIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIne."

Sorry, Lionel, the Chamber of Commerce runs businesses in this town and knows about traffic. You live in the Manor area, so are not subjected to it every day, even weekends, with the tunnel making matters worse. As far as Ocean Shore School goes, you live on the side that is right by the freeway on-ramp, so that shouldn't bother you either. The only "tale makers" are you and your friends.

In my recent post, I quoted a professional traffic engineer's opinion on Highway 1 during our ride and observations. It was clear that the pedestrian cycle was stopping traffic for the dog walkers and others to cross Highway 1 at Reina del Mar. A pedestrian overcrossing for the walkers, bike riders, and students who use the SamTrans bus stop would clearly be a benefit. His point was simple: Saving seconds here and there adds to total minutes saved for traffic flow. Finding ways to fund and implement a variety of alternatives is reasonable. How many buses and other alternative solutions will $50 million buy? When the facts come out on Caltrans' plans, people will begin to understand how significant and negative the impacts will be. Alternative solutions will be demanded. We do need solutions. I suggest we start thinking about the alternatives now.

"1. The school district has already said buses are not an option, and it won't be altering school start times. And school is not the problem; there's heavy traffic every day at rush hour, morning and afternoon and on weekends."

Not my experience on Pacifica's roads in the summer, when school's out, and that includes the Manor Drive bridge near where I live, but then I'm an "untrained amateur."

"There will not be giant soundwalls, as stated by some."

How do you know that, when no clear drawing schematic, whatever, has been provided?

"And sorry, but I believe our police and fire (over untrained amateurs) when they say the current highway is unsafe and leads to delays in emergency response."

So like most of the "untrained amateurs" out here, I say: "Where is the evidence?" Dude, you should stop believing in Chamber of Commerce fairy tales.

Mr. Leon, with all due respect:

1. The school district has already said buses are not an option, and it won't be altering school start times. And school is not the problem; there's heavy traffic every day at rush hour, morning and afternoon and on weekends.

2. The company that does the traffic light timing that everyone talked about here said in its report to the city that it isn't an option in this circumstance because there's not enough capacity.

3. Pedestrians are not the problem and neither are large trucks.

We need to widen the highway, as the real experts have said. There will not be giant soundwalls, as stated by some. People are not going to abandon their cars and telecommute. And sea level rise has nothing to do with this.

The new highway will be more attractive and safer than what we have now with a landscaped median. And it will make it easier to exit at Rockaway and Vallemar, which will help out those businesses.

And sorry, but I believe our police and fire (over untrained amateurs) when they say the current highway is unsafe and leads to delays in emergency response.

I drove Highway 1 during the morning commute with a traffic engineer last week. He suggested that a multifaceted approach would help relieve congestion. Adjust school start time schedule, add school buses, install traffic signal improvements, and add a pedestrian overpass at Reina del Mar to eliminate the intersection's pedestrian walk cycle. Also discussed was having large trucks like cement trucks and trash haulers alter their schedules and avoid the peak commute time.

"The tunnel has increased the use of this highway."

Now that is an exaggeration. There is no factual basis to support this claim.

"What will you do when that fails? Human sacrifice?"

No, Chris, when you tell the truth, apart from your huge debt you owe to this city government for the job you hold, we'll all fall down dead.

Hi, all: I do leave at different times every day depending on what my schedule entails and traffic is the same. My husband does miss it at 4:30 a.m. each day. A majority of the time, my job duties require me to be onsite, so that is where I am. Discussion has gone on for years, but previously the same people saying they were not involved in discussions were fighting against any Quarry development because the "already bad traffic" would be worse with the influx of traffic to the Quarry. Now, there is no problem and because the City Council agrees with your first assessment, now you are going to the courts. What will you do when that fails? Human sacrifice?

"Fire and police say we need it for safety, and our City Council has said it wants this to move forward."

Uh, Bobby, fire and police may say so, but they haven't presented one shred of hard evidence that we've EVER had a problem to date.
There's your "junk science."

According to the Caltrans Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), this is NOT a safety project. Safety is not the "purpose and need" of the project. Adding lanes will not improve access for emergency vehicles. The FEIR says, "The intent of the shoulder widening would be to improve emergency vehicle response times" but this alternative is rejected because it "would not meet the purpose and need" of the project. If fire and police say the widened highway is needed for safety, they misunderstand what Caltrans is proposing. What happens when a major accident or natural disaster closes the widened highway and north-south access is cut off entirely? The extra lanes won't help fire or police then. What's needed for safety are widened shoulders and a frontage road that provides an alternative route between Rockaway/Fassler and Vallemar/Fairway Park in case of emergency. Widening the highway does not improve safety, and Caltrans acknowledges this in the FEIR.

Yes, we have talked about this for 25 years. This is a much-needed safety project. No, Todd, a manager can't work from home; neither can most of us. All these harebrained ideas about timing lights and school schedules are all junk science.

I believe most Pacificans who commute every day know that road needs to be widened. Fire and police say we need it for safety, and our City Council has said it wants this to move forward.

"We've talked about this for 25 years."

If "we" had, there would have been an ongoing public dialog between the city and various agencies AND THE PUBLIC. The public was left out of this one, and the City of Pacifica -- which is a Project Sponsor -- has said virtually nothing publicly.

Which is how the City of Pacifica gave its electorate a very expensive boondoggle.

Carl: PSC is currently setting up a mechanism to receive donations. Contributions will be sorely needed to cover administrative costs. The info will be posted here as soon as it's available.

Hi, Chris, I imagine that as manager of Recology most of your work is in the digital realm. While I respect your job, a lot of it is voice and email reply, which hardly requires you to be at the office. Another thought is to leave your home earlier or later, but you've already said several times you don't want to.

A smart phone could easily be your "office" desk, which would put you "at work" anywhere in the world, even on vacation. Is your commute really worth $50 million plus the unaccounted-for tens of millions of dollars already spent on this project by city, county, and state employees?

"We have talked about this for 25 years, you newcomers."

No, Chris, "we" haven't. The agencies have, if you read Todd's excellent research, and they decided long ago what's best for us.

The City Council has been in favor of this project for a long time, and several members back. Sue Digre is the only one I know of who's actually voiced objections. The rest have cowered behind closed doors at public opinion, and obfuscated when the great unwashed public has been given the very few and inadequate opportunities to tell Caltrans, et al., what they think of this monstrous plan.

And try 56 years in this town for my family, and we ain't leavin'!

The biggest contributor to the backup is people not paying attention and not accelerating when the light turns green and not keeping up with the car in front of them! Easily twice as many cars could pass through each light cycle if people would just pay attention and drive their freaking cars instead of letting huge gaps open up!

Ain't relentless, unsustainable, one-percent-enriching population growth just ducky?

As an admirer of those attempting to defend literacy, numeracy, and ecolacy, and as a daily commuter between Moss Beach and Eureka Square in Pacifica, I'd like to know if PSC is set up and willing to accept donations to help with this legal effort.

Chris, 35-plus years. But it depends on who is counting.

Mr. Caltrans, tear down this soundwall.

My prediction came true that now that people in the PSC no longer have control of the City Council and cannot get their wishes done in that venue, the court system would be next choice. I travel this corridor every morning and the traffic is awful. The tunnel has increased the use of this highway, so get a grip on whatever you feel the problem is and let us other longtime Pacificans enjoy the coastal living also. Do me a favor, too, if it's not too much to ask, and stop exaggerating. We have talked about this for 25 years, you newcomers. The time to take action is now.

@Bobby Hutchinson:

I posted a response to your post on fixpacifica. However, it hasn't yet appeared.

I will get back to you with a detailed answer later today.

(Editor's Note: Dear Conan the Libertarian, since you use a screen name and a fake email address, I have no idea where to send your bill for advertising your post on our rival site Fix Pacifica. But since FP's Steve Sinai is a fellow Forester driver, I will comp you this time. Just don't push your luck.)

@PB:

How about mandating that all persons of ability should use their feet and/or bicycles for their transport in Pacifica?

I will get back to you with an explanation of why the current traffic light setup actually contributes to more pollution later today.

Meanwhile, I'd suggest studying up on the effects of "stop-and-go" and "slowing-down" driving on gas-fueled engine vehicles.

Also, if you want pristine, untouched environment, there might be a spot for you in the Amazon jungle or the Himalayas. Just maybe.

What a pleasant surprise to wake up this morning and see this wonderful news about a lawsuit being filed against three separate public agencies that have been acting like sovereigns to date regarding this Calera Parkway Project nonsense. Having set up the Project Development Team that consists of employees from all three agencies (City of Pacifica, Caltrans, and San Mateo County Transportation Authority), these three agencies have spent to date well over $5 million on outside consultants alone, not including the untold man hours put into this project by the staffs of all three agencies.

After numerous trips to the District 4 offices to view mountains of files on the Calera Parkway Project dating back to the 1960s, it's clear to me that staff time equals (if not greatly surpasses) the amount of money wasted on private consultants. So for a project that is advertised as costing about $50 million, it's already spent at least $10 million if not $20 million on staff time. Who knew the widening proposal was such a moneymaker for state, county, and city engineers?

Thank you, PSC, I'm glad it's you and not me.

"But if they are willing to remove the lights at Vallemar and Rockaway, and build an exit/entry ramp, then it will work."

If you want a freeway through town, move to Southern California -- or Miami Beach.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Red Rocks, Colorado and Utah

  • IMG_0955
    By John Maybury riding Amtrak

Southeast France

  • 30-Sainte Agnes
    Photos by John Elk

Viva Mexico

  • Mexico 01 Mexico City Cathedral
    Photos by John Elk

Snow Train

  • IMG_0830
    Photos by John Maybury, onboard Amtrak's California Zephyr

Uzbekistan

  • 7-Samakand
    Photos by John Elk

Dordogne

  • 12-Chateau de Commarque sunset
    Photos by John Elk

Brittany

  • 5-Cado
    Photos by John Elk

Canyons, Cliffs & Clouds

  • IMG_0714
    Photos by John Maybury

Italy

  • 44-Ravello
    Photos by John Elk

Australian Rainforest

  • 2016_0529reunionfamily0032_opt
    Photos by Joel Maybury

Pacifica Shorebirds

  • 20110819_7165.2
    Photos by Paul Donahue

Colombia

  • 20-San Agustin painted statue
    Photos by John Elk

Hot Rods @ Sea Bowl

  • Img_0111
    Photos by John Maybury

Botswana

  • 27-Okavango elephant
    Photos by John Elk

Namibia

  • 16-Etosha rhinoceros
    Photos by John Elk

Scary Pumpkins

  • Unknown-16
    Photos by Ray Villafane

Big Sur

  • P1030837
    Photos by Dave Yuhas

Joshua Tree Natl. Park

  • Img_0815
    Photos by John Maybury

Gray Lodge

  • IMG_0985
    Photos by John Maybury

Yachats, Oregon

  • IMG_1044
    Photos by John Maybury

Bagpipes on the Beach

  • Img_0258
    Photos by John Maybury

Tucson Botanical Gardens

  • Img_0794
    Photos by John Maybury

Pima Air/Space Museum

  • Img_0758
    Photos by John Maybury

Desert Springtime

  • Img_0839
    Photos by John Maybury
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 03/2007