Whether or not you decide to increase your property taxes by $118 a year to support Pacifica School District (PSD) employees and their pensions by voting for the parcel tax renewal November 8, you may want to ponder a few numbers readily available on pages 6 and 13 of PSD's most recent audit, which you can verify by visiting PSD offices on Reina Del Mar. The company preparing the audit admittedly did not fact-check the financial information, relying on staff assurances that it was correct.
PSD has a combined enrollment of 3,226 students and an operating budget last year of $29,584,810, or $9,170.74 per student. By comparison, a popular local private grammar school on the north end of town charges $6,421 a year tuition per student—$2,749.74 less than what we collectively provide per PSD student. PSD has outstanding liabilities of $44,589,611, including a $36 million bond obligation and $8,057,645 in accounts payable, or in lay terms, unpaid bills. It is surprising since PSD has sold so much public property to private developers. PSD reported a $13 million surplus after the last 10-acre school property was sold a few years ago. PSD now is going through the motions of selling off two more public properties, but that has nothing to do with renewing the upcoming parcel tax.
I've requested PSD salary information three times in the past few weeks. The info I ask for is identical to that found on State Controller John Chiang's website showing what employees from the City of Pacifica and North Coast County Water District earned last year—so helpful last spring with the fire tax. Compensation sheets list positions only (no names) and amounts shown in Box 5 on annual W-2 forms that PSD must give each employee. PSD has no such info, I am told, which is stonewalling, in my opinion, as W-2s are required by IRS. I'm sure PSD easily could pull this info together from its accounting software. If PSD would make public the compensation paid to its administrators, facilities department, groundskeepers, and the like, we would have a better idea of why it spends $9,170.74 per student. Since PSD so often boasts of how little it pays its teaching staff, the money must go somewhere.
Clearly, PSD, which is its own government body, needs to be more transparent to show it deserves more of our tax dollars, especially in understanding its obligation of openness to the public at large, not just to motivated parents, who want us to further fund their children’s education. At $9,170.74 per student, PSD needs to own up and publish a full compensation sheet that includes non-classroom staff like administrators, facilities, and groundskeepers, among others, in a timely fashion well before Election Day.
You may or may not support the parcel tax renewal, but please vote on this item either by mail ballot or at the polls November 8. It is an off-year election, and voter participation is expected to be low. Millions of dollars of our property taxes will be voted on, and whether or not you want to tax yourself and your neighbors to further fund PSD salaries, pensions, and other expenses, it is important that this parcel tax measure get a large turnout so, win or lose, it gets a fair shake.
TODD MCCUNE BRAY
(See PSD response to this op-ed in the following post.)
Recent Comments